Adenoma
Author: Bill H. Warren, MD
Synonyms
- Hepatocellular adenoma
- Liver cell adenoma
- Telangiectatic/inflammatory adenoma (formerly telangiectatic FNH)
Epidemiology
- Rare benign neoplasm, less common than FNH
- More common in young women (ages 20-44), especially with prolonged oral contraceptive use
- Incidence with oral contraceptives estimated 4/100.000 users
- Female:male ratio 10:1
- Pregnancy increases growth rate and risk of rupture
- May decrease in size and decrease risk of rupture if oral contraceptives discontinued
- Increased risk of rupture: size >5 cm and subcapsular location
- Does not exist in cirrhosis
Etiology
- Increased incidence with use of oral contraceptives and anabolic steroids
- Hepatic steatosis associated with increased number and growth rate of adenomas
- Multiple adenomas commonly seen in von Gierke type 1A glycogen storage disease
- Increased incidence with diabetes mellitus
Pathology
- Arises from hepatocytes
- Recent genetic and pathologic studies have resulted in a new classification of adenomas that accounts for >90% of adenomas:
3 subtypes:
- Inflammatory / teleangiectatic (formerly "teleangiectatic FNH") hepatocellular adenoma—accounts for 40-50% of adenomas, associated with IL6ST gene, characterized by sinusoidal dilatation (i.e. intralesional peliosis), and prone to internal hemorrhage
- HNF 1-a-mutated hepatocellular adenoma—accounts for 30-35% of adenomas and is characterized by diffuse internal steatosis
- Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenoma—accounts for 10-15% of adenomas, increased frequency in men, with increased risk of development of hepatocellular carcinoma
- May be mistaken clinically and pathologically for HCC
- May degenerate into HCC, especially if >10 cm
- Large size range (1-30 cm)
- Usually single but may be multiple (adenomatosis)
- Well circumscribed mass with fibrous pseudocapsule
- Microscopically absence of portal and central veins and bile ducts, which distinguishes adenoma from FNH
Clinical Presentation
- Typical presentation is young woman on oral contraceptive with right upper quadrant or epigastric pain secondary to hemorrhage
- LFTs usually normal
- Higher risk of rupture during pregnancy
Imaging Findings
General
- Heterogeneous hypervascular mass with foci of fat and hemorrhage
- May contain calcification or areas of necrosis
- Most commonly subcapsular right lobe of liver (75%)
- Intraparenchymal or pedunculated (10%)
CT
Unenhanced
- Well-defined mass, usually isodense, may be hypodense from fat
- Hemorrhage—subcapsular, intratumoral, or parenchymal
- Fat and calcification less commonly seen
Arterial
heterogeneous hyperdense enhancement
Portal venous
hyper-, iso-, or hypodense to liver
Equilibrium
- Generally homogeneously iso- or hypodense (washout)
- May have hyperattenuated pseudocapsule
- Larger lesions generally heterogeneously hypodense
MR
T1w
- Heterogeneous signal intensity
- Increased signal intensity secondary to fat and recent hemorrhage
- Decreased signal intensity secondary to calcification and old hemorrhage
- Hypointense fibrous pseudocapsule
T2w
- Heterogeneous signal intensity
- Increased signal intensity from old hemorrhage and necrosis
- Decreased signal intensity from fat and recent hemorrhage
- Hypointense fibrous pseudocapsule
- Fat suppression distinguishes fat from hemorrhage
Opposed-phase GRE
Helpful to detect presence of fat
Arterial
heterogeneous enhancement
Delayed
typically heterogenerously hypointense (washout) with hyperintense pseudocapsule
Hepatospecific
- Usually no uptake or retention of contrast agent—hypointense to liver
- Best for differentiating from FNH, which will be iso- to hyperintense compared to liver
US
General
findings are non-specific
Gray-scale
- Heterogeneous well-circumscribed mass that may be hyper- or hypoechoic
- Heterogeneous appearance may be due to hemorrhage, fat, necrosis, or calcification
Color Doppler/contrast-enhanced US
- Hypervascular mass
- Large peripheral arteries and veins
- May assist in making the distinction from FNH because of the appearance of intratumoral and peritumoral vessels in the absence of a central arterial signal (absence of spoke wheel artery)
Differential Diagnosis
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) - May be identical to adenoma on imaging, especially well-differentiated
- Fibrolamellar HCC - Usually large lobulated mass with central scar and septa
- Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) - Homogeneous enhancement on arterial phase, central scar on T2, which enhances on delayed imaging, hyperintense with hepatospecific Gd contrast agents:
- Hypervascular metastasis - Usually multiple, history of primary malignancy
Management
- Asymptomatic lesions <5 cm—discontinue OCPs and re-image in 6 months
- Lesions >5 cm and/or subcapsular location-surgical resection
- Avoid pregnancy with known adenoma or consider prophylactic surgical resection prior to pregnancy because of unpredictable response during pregnancy
- If discovered incidentally during pregnancy, plan surgical resection during second trimester for large or subcapsular lesions because of risk of spontaneous rupture
Bibliography
- Grazioli L, Bondioni MP, Haradome H, Motosugi U, Tinti R, Frittoli B, Gambarini S, Donato F, Colagrande S. Hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):520-9.
- Katabathina VS, Menias CO, Shanbhogue AK, Jagirdar J, Paspulati RM, Prasad SR. Genetics and imaging of hepatocellular adenomas: 2011 update. Radiographics. 2011 Oct;31(6):1529-43.
- Goodwin MD, Dobson JE, Sirlin CB, Lim BG, Stella DL. Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. Radiographics. 2011 Oct;31(6):1547-68.
- Silva AC, Evans JM, McCullough AE, Jatoi MA, Vargas HE, Hara AK. MR imaging of hypervascular liver masses: a review of current techniques. Radiographics. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):385-402.
- Anderson SW, Kruskal JB, Kane RA. Benign hepatic tumors and iatrogenic pseudotumors. Radiographics. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):211-29.
- Gandhi SN, Brown MA, Wong JG, Aguirre DA, Sirlin CB. MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how. Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1621-36.
- Grazioli L, Federle MP, Brancatelli G, Ichikawa T, Olivetti L, Blachar A. Hepatic adenomas: imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics. 2001;21(4):877.
- Attal P, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, Paradis V, Terris B, Belghiti J. Telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia: US, CT, and MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation in 13 cases. Radiology. 2003;228(2):465–72.
- STATdx—Diagnostic Imaging for Radiology. Amirsys Publishing Inc. 2013
- UpToDate—Hepatic Adenoma, Wolters Kluver Health, 2013